Constitutional Law

The Rights of Pregnant Women and A visibly pregnant Delilah Jones bear on that she was going to crapulence her baby to termination . While Jones brilliant to drill inebriant to induce an abortion or a the birth of a stillborn child may be moralisticisticly repugnant to most people , a round of outcome right touch abortion and women s reproductive rights indicates that she was inwardly her implicit in(p) rights to make this decision . Although the Supreme courtyard has not govern specifically on the Wisconsin law , it appears that any law which restricts the use of alcohol and separate substances by pregnant women may be unconstitutionalAs noted in Maher v . hard roe (1977 ) the decl be has a strong and legitimate interest in shape up normal childbearing From an estimable or moral vista , the State s inte rest in encouraging normal accouchement which by extension includes an interest in encouraging women to occupy to healthy pregnancies , is deeply rooted in the history of occidental civilization . In addition to these historic ethical and moral considerations in preserving the health of an unborn child , the State as well as has a compelling economic interest in value the health of a fetus . The cost of caring for a child born with fetal alcohol syndrome drug addictions , and other(a) complications that ar related to the dumbfound s communicate during pregnancy roll in the hay be very high and may bulge an idle burden on healthcare systems , education systems , and amicable operate . In many cases , these complications may contribute womb-to-tomb implications that take aim ongoing care and additional servicesThese ethical and economic interests in healthy pregnancies have led or so States to pass laws regarding the conduct of women during pregnancy and excessive consumption of alcohol or other forms of su! bstance abuse (Wisconsin Statute 48 .02 ,. 3 .

in time , while laws protecting a fetus from the harmful behaviors of the mother may be well-meaning , a review of germane(predicate) case law indicates that such laws are ultimately unconstitutional and are a violation of the fair sex s constitutional rightsIn Roe v . Wade (1973 , the Supreme solicit ruled that a woman has the right to terminate a pregnancy . Since the Court s ruling in Roe , some(prenominal) attempts have been do to restrict the right to terminate a pregnancy or to prescribe the behavior in which a pregnancy may be terminated . In Stenberg v . Ca rhart (2000 , the Court ruled that laws restricting the use of one of these restrictions , a procedure referred to as partial birth abortion , were unconstitutional . Stenberg affirms the Court s amoral attitude towards abortion which was noted earlier in Maher , that abortion and childbirth , when stripped of the sensitive moral arguments surrounding the abortion careen , are simply two secondary medical methods of transaction with pregnancy In Stenberg , the Court appeared to be saying that women have a wide choice when selecting the manner in which they volition terminate their pregnancies , including choices that other people major power find virtuously repugnant . When Jones announced that she was going to drink this baby to death , she was simply...If you want to get a plentiful essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay