Reichstag Fire

Reichstag Fire The Reichstag Fire 1. Source A was written by Rudolf Diels, who was the head of the Prussian political police at the m of the fire. In his account of events, he explains that he caught Van Der Lubbe rose-cheeked handed, the suspect was alone and there was no evidence that he could see that involved other people, even other communistics. He strongly disagreed with gore and Hitler’s theory that Van Der Lubbe was attending in some way, and that the whole affair was a communist plot to seize power.

During the trial of Van Der Lubbe in 1933, he openly confe ssed to setting fire to the building, but denied that he had been helped. His taradiddle in source B shows that he was adamant that he had worked alone. This would seem to prove Diels’ theory, however, Van Der Lubbe could easily have been equivocation in rear to protect the other arsonists, who would have believably been high ranking members of the communist party according to gore’s theory, and therefo...If you want to get a full essay, give it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay